
(b. 1960)
A young writer mesmerized by music, Benoit Duteurtre studied musicology in Rouen and in Paris. He is the author of short stories, essays and novels which include:
- (1985) Sommeil Perdu
- (1987) Les vaches
- (1989) L'amoureux malgré lui
- (1992) Tout doit disparaître
- (1996) Gaieté parisienne
- (1997) Drôle de temps
- (1999) Les malentendus
- (2000) À propos des vaches
- (2000) Les belles lettres
- (2001) Le voyage en France
- (2003) Service Clientèle
- (2004) La Rebelle
- (2005) La petite fille et la cigarette
- (2006) Chemin de fer
- (2007) Ma belle époque
He is also a member of the committee of readers of the Editions Denoel. On the music side, he is the author of a work called "L’opérette en France" (le Seuil edition) which has been transmitted on television stations France 3 and 5. His musical comedy "Viva L'Opera-Comique" was quite successful in March 2004. He also did an adaptation of "Veronique" starring French actress Fanny Ardant at Chatelet in December 2007. Mr. Duteurtre writes regularly for several newspapers such as Marianne, Le Figaro Litteraire and Le Monde de la musique. He serves as the director of the association of Musique Nouvelle en Liberté. Between 1996 and 1999, he had his own radio show on France Music called "Les beaux dimanches" (Beautiful Sundays) and since 1999 another show , "Etonnez-moi, Benoit" (Shock me, Benoit). He shares his time between New York, Paris and Normandy.

In The Little Girl and the Cigarette, Duteurtre takes a swing at our over legislated world. A death row inmate, Desire Johnson, becomes everyone hero when he asks for his right to smoke his final cigarette in a smoke free prison. A little girl accuses an "Average Joe", who happens to hate children, of pedophilia when she catches him secretly smoking in the bathroom of a smoke-free building. Contrary to Johnson, his cigarette will take him on a adventure to "Martyr Idol". Duteurtre creates a world where children have the final word, where the tobacco giants and the media sway the public, and finally the 21st century reliability reality TV shows. | |  |
The Effects of Reality Television on its Viewers
SHAWN, JOEL, and KATIE
Many people don't realize the harmful effects in watching television. Besides the fact that sitting on a couch for hours upon hours is unhealthy, it's the images and ideas people, especially children, take in that are becoming more and more apparent as television and reality shows grow more popular. In Lawrence Kelemen's "What They Don't Want You to Know About Television and Videos", he states that alcohol is the most consumed beverage on prime-time television shows, and is drank twice as much as tea or coffee, and fourteen times as much as soda and other soft drinks. Kelemen says that alcohol is implicated in more than 40% of all academic problems, 28% of all dropouts and on a typical weekend one teenager dies every two hours from a car crash involving alcohol. If a teenager sees his or her favorite contestant on The Real World chugging down beers with his friends and having a great time, what's to stop them from doing the same?
Kelemen went on to write in his piece that in 1997, the average U.S. child watched television 25 hours a week. In this year alone, the average child spent 260 full hours JUST watching commercials. In 1964, the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, now known as the Department of Health and Human Services, asked 650,000 students in 4,000 U.S. schools a number of questions about television viewing patterns. Government officials were surprised to find that the more television students watched, the lower their achievement scores were. Yet, here we are more than 40 years later and children are watching more TV than ever before.
Television stations put reality shows on their networks to provide people with entertainment, not to set an example for children and young adults. However, the flow of information in schools and within groups of school-aged children allows ideas to spread rapidly, including what may have been on the latest episode of a favorite TV show. When a character on their favorite reality show does something, they are not going to think about whether or not it is right or wrong, but simply whether or not their friends will think it is “cool”. While some cable networks, such as The Learning Channel, entertain their audiences with self-help programs, others, such as MTV and Bravo, put anything on television that they think will boost their viewership. Shows such as TLC’s What Not to Wear try to set good examples for people, encouraging self-reflection and individuality. Other shows are not as helpful, pitting Adults and even young children against each other as they fight to win. VH1 is currently running a series called I Know My Kid’s a Star where mother-daughter teams are fighting against each other to prove that they are the best bet to survive in Hollywood. Meanwhile, even Animal Planet is sinking to new lows, starting its own reality series entitled Groomer Has It where contestants vie for audience votes based on their skills as dog groomers. This type of show produces competitive tendencies in the children who watch them. While their teachers are trying to teach them about cooperation and teamwork, they are being brainwashed by their new role models on television who are teaching them that life in the real world is all about being on top and doing crazy things to make people like you. The days when Sesame Street and Barney were all kids watched are long gone, but who will take their place in children’s lives? The most likely contenders are the competitors on reality shows.
Along this same line, more and more shows are becoming based on winning money. Shows like Who Wants to be a Millionaire, where contestants answer increasingly difficult questions on all different topics ranging from sports to Greek mythology to politics to mathematics, set a good example by teaching children that it pays to learn and do well in school. New shows like Deal or No Deal, where contestants attempt to guess which suitcase from the group of thirty contains a million dollars, teach children that it pays to gamble. Children are also learning from such shows that you do not need to be educated to win, only risk-takers.
As more and more children are exposed to this kind of television programming, they are losing the values that their parents are trying to instill in them. After watching these programs, children will not be able to tell the difference between reality and television. By calling reality television “reality” today’s society is lying. If people acted out in this manner at their real jobs, they would immediately be fired. When shows were advertised as fiction, this did not create a problem. Now that the audience is being told that these shows are “reality” (even if, as in most cases, this is not true), they believe that the actions of the contestants are acceptable. Sending this message to children whose minds are still extremely malleable is the horrible effect reality television has on children.
Interesting Court Cases by Michelle
In the Little Girl and the Cigarette, the man who is sentenced to death would like a cigarette as his final wish. The only problem is that the jail is non-smoking, and a frenzy of laws come into play, leading to the complete cancellation of the man’s execution. But is this true today? Are cases out of hand and are people really “sue happy” or are the only cases that actually go to trial the important ones? Here is a list of a few cases that I compiled as evidence to this question:
On FOXnews.com a woman is reportedly seeking damages after chewing on Starburst candies. She reasons her claim that the candies say they are chews but she has dentures and now contracted temporal mandibular joint dysfunction, she is seeking $25,000 for damages. Source:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286855,00.html
Ever wonder why coffee cups are produced with warning labels on them? The reason is to avoid frivolous lawsuits like the one a McDonald’s customer filed after being “severely burned” by the scalding coffee. She was to settle for $10,000 but McDonald’s appealed the decision. Apparently, thermodynamics were involved in the decision to award Ms. Stella Liebeck to $480,000. Source: http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
One casino faces a difficult lawsuit by a compulsive gambler. The woman was once a lawyer but gambled away all her money, was soon disbarred for taking money from clients and using it to gamble. She lost her house and owes the IRS $58,000. “They knew I was going for days without eating and sleeping,” Taveras said. “I would pass out at the tables. They had a duty of care to me. Nobody in their right mind would gamble for four or five straight days without sleeping.” She has filed a $20 million racketeering lawsuit against notable casinos such as the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino. The casino representatives claim it was her responsibility. Source: http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/legal_issues/legal_updates/jesters_courtroom/tales.html
These cases make the headlines because of their outrageousness, but it begs the question of what have we all become. No one takes responsibility for their own actions and needs someone else to blame and receive money from them. The whole of the issue is that too many of these cases are real and are a waste of time. Some groups against frivolous lawsuits are Center for Individual Freedom and most states have a frivolous lawsuit committee to combat these types of cases if they arise. Still I argue that more work needs to be done to allow people to be responsible for their own actions.
Reality Television is one of the biggest fads in America. It is put on our screens because it is a form of entertainment. Americans can’t get enough of the torture, emvarrassment, temptation, drama of other regular, everyday people being placed in unrealistic and manipulated settings for the world to see. MTV’s The Real World has become the darling of reality television and the inspiration for the average American’s fifteen minutes of fame, which continues to fuel the fire of volunteer based reality programming today. Source: http://clearinghouse.missouriwestern.edu/manuscripts/409.asp It seems every reality television show I have ever watched has the gay man, the manly man, the guy who hates homosexuals, the attractive blond with large breasts, the large black man, and the drama queen. And its funny how the roommates can hate each other the whole season but once the time comes around for them to leave its like they were best friends all their life. Also I don’t think its coincidence that two of the roommates almost always are attracted to each other, hookup, and then despise one another.
There is a reason television networks give such a push for reality programming. It costs a lot less to put together a reality show than a scripted drama. According Laurie Hibberd,, Reality shows cost an average of $400,000 per hour to produce versus $2 million per hour for a dramatic series. She also says that with this vastly less expensive option and the ratings for reality programming going through the roof, every network that wants to continue doing business feels the need to market new reality shows and somehow keep America begging for more. Source: http://clearinghouse.missouriwestern.edu/manuscripts/409.asp This formula is clearly working and networks won’t stop until it doesn’t succeed anymore. Reality television is about money and the networks are laughing straight to the bank with it.
Children caught in polygamy by Joe
As the narrator in the “Little girl and the cigarette” had been convicted for a crime against children, the reality of these violations are existent in our present-day society and the people who engage in them have no inclination to stop in doings so. Chlidren caught in Polygamy The issue of protecting children is something that is being questioned in recent headlines. Shows such as “To catch a predator” on NBC, have created an exposure to the people who commit the acts against children. A recent headline that has stirred up publicity of child protection, has been from an investigation that Texas authorities focused into the religious sect named the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints located in El Dorado, Texas The case of the FLD had stemmed pertaining from a polygamy case of a 16 year old girl who was forced to marry, have sex, and become impregnated by a 50 year old man named Dave Barlow who has had a previous criminal record of committing sex crimes against minors.
“Barlow, 50, is a son of former Colorado City, Ariz., mayor Dan Barlow; he also was one of eight Colorado City men accused by Arizona prosecutors in 2005 of marrying underage girls and committing sex crimes.”
After the raid began, investigators had found that a number of teenage girls were found pregnant at the compound. A more thorough investigation had found that the FLDS were marrying off underage girls to older men. The FLDS also required that immediately thereafter it was required that they were to immediately engage in sexual activities after the marriages. Due to the separation of church and state, authorities were fearful of intervening within the boundaries of the church. If religious cults such as the FLDS, can stay protected behind these boundaries, then people such as Barlow can manage to go around the rules of the law that mandate the rights of children and their freedoms, even though there is no right for a religious organization to be able to express child or spousal abuse or polygamy. The harsh imprisonment that the narrator had faced could be consider adequate, because this case emphasizes what the resultant could be if the protection of children is not monitored. Harsh imprisonment such as a death sentence would discourage the would-be sex offenders to re-evaluate the risks and the consequences associated with committing a crime against a child, and could therefore lead to less instances of children being violated.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/11/yfz.search.ap/index.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marci-hamilton/prosecuting-polygamy-in-e_b_95674.html
http://messengerandadvocate.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/overkill-in-el-dorado-texas/
Our Future
by Yovanny
After reading this book it's hard to be optimistic about the future of humanity. With the way things are now with the climate and how we affect it, it seems only a matter of time before we can't live here. We have had many advancements in technology and as a civilization. Most nations around the world believe in freedom and promote civil rights, as a society we try to give power to everyone. But now things have change, society seems overprotective of itself and believes in only the greater good. Freedoms have been taken away to protect the general public from themselves. Smoking is ban in many public places, the FCC is regulating TV and Radio programs, and our taste for drama in reality shows seems to be degrading our image as a society. Benoit paints a picture of a society similar to ours only exaggerated. After finishing the book I felt that everything in the book could play out in reality, and this bothered me. It made me think that if society could regulate smoking like it is now, it could ban smoking all together just for the safety of children and the general pubic. If the society in Benoit's book could take this step forward, what's to stop them from banning alcohol or other vices. What's to stop us? If the government in Benoit's book cared so much about the well being of children, wouldn't they start regulating what's on TV or radio? It seems possible that they would go further and take away more rights from the people. Songs that would pose a bad influence to children and promote violence, could be banned. Video games with a lot of action would be off the market as well. It seems we're on that path. If we as a society care so much about maintaining a moral and healthy environment, couldn't that lead us to a world where the government regulates everything we do?
Like in "V for Vendetta" this movie is also an exageration of our society and as well a exageration of the society presented in Benoit's Book. The movie is about a anarchist who leads the people of a totalitarian government to rise up and rebel. In the movie, this government is shown to have control over every matter and regulates the lives of everyone day to day. People must obey the curfew times set for them and yield to authority. The government has no toleration for those who break the law. The civilians obey the laws out of fear of being punished by the government.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta
With all the restrictions we have as a society today it seems we may be on the course to living in a society like the one presented in Benoit's book or the movie "V for Vendetta." If we start caring more about the physical health of children it could move on to caring about their mental health; then move on to caring about the mental health of the general public, and finally caring about the physical health of the general public, where the government would impose curfews just to create a more peaceful society. It's a scary possiblity, but the more power we give to the government the more freedoms we could lose.
Duteurtre's Society and Ours
by Holly
In The Little Girl and the Cigarette, Duteurtre’s intentions are to mock the many aspects of modern society that he views as being absurd. Though Dutteurtre’s story takes place in a fictional setting, it is clear that many of the faults he works into his plot are derived from problems that we experience in the world today. First, he mocks the media and the way they over dramatize situations to lure in viewers. This is especially clear in the chapter describing the media attention that Desire Johnson’s last cigarette receives. It is reminiscent of the night-and-day coverage of the O.J. Simpson trial, and the abundance of court shows on television. In addition to court television, he comments on reality television. In the novel, the narrator becomes a contestant on the terrorist-run game show, Martyr Idol, where the hostages are made to perform stupid tasks in order to gain votes and save themselves from execution. The representation of the different cultures among the contestants is ironic; one would assume that this is to be sensitive to all cultures who will be watching the show, as producers do for reality television today. However, the irony lies in the fact that the show is run by terrorists, which seems to be a comparison Duteurtre makes between terrorists and television producers today. Governmental corruption also plays a large role in Duteurtre’s society. The narrator works in a government building where children have free reign because of the Governor’s efforts to create a society where youth is a driving force behind legislation. The Governor won’t listen to any negative criticism; when the narrator has clear evidence of the “cleaner air” policies actually polluting air more, he is disregarded. This is similar to our government in that we constantly hear of government cover-ups, specifically in relation to the war in Iraq. Government officials take great precautions to ensure that negativity is kept away from their issues.